<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 1016 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162355</link>
    <description>A statutory right of appeal may be made subject to pre-deposit conditions, and under section 39(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, the appellate authority may waive deposit only on being satisfied that the dealer is unable to pay the assessed amount. In considering such relief, the authority is to assess financial incapacity and not the merits of the assessment. On the facts noted, the authorities considered the dealer&#039;s assets and financial position and granted only partial relief. The High Court found no legal infirmity or exceptional ground for writ interference, so complete waiver was refused and the conditional order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 1016 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162355</link>
      <description>A statutory right of appeal may be made subject to pre-deposit conditions, and under section 39(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, the appellate authority may waive deposit only on being satisfied that the dealer is unable to pay the assessed amount. In considering such relief, the authority is to assess financial incapacity and not the merits of the assessment. On the facts noted, the authorities considered the dealer&#039;s assets and financial position and granted only partial relief. The High Court found no legal infirmity or exceptional ground for writ interference, so complete waiver was refused and the conditional order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>