<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 622 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162354</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the seizure, valuation, and penalty imposed by the authorities. It determined that the goods were correctly classified as specified goods under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. The valuation based on maximum retail price with a 10% deduction was deemed appropriate, and the penalty imposed at the maximum rate of 25% was justified. The applicant&#039;s arguments were found lacking in evidence and substance. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the application without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 622 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162354</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the seizure, valuation, and penalty imposed by the authorities. It determined that the goods were correctly classified as specified goods under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. The valuation based on maximum retail price with a 10% deduction was deemed appropriate, and the penalty imposed at the maximum rate of 25% was justified. The applicant&#039;s arguments were found lacking in evidence and substance. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the application without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>