<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 545 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162351</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the audit report under the Income-tax Act is sufficient for compliance with section 10A of the Assam General Sales Tax Act. The dealer needs to furnish Form XXXI-A, and the accountant&#039;s audit report/certificate in Form XXXI is deemed satisfactory. The review petition by the Assam Drug Dealers Association was allowed, providing clarification on the compliance requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:03:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 545 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162351</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the audit report under the Income-tax Act is sufficient for compliance with section 10A of the Assam General Sales Tax Act. The dealer needs to furnish Form XXXI-A, and the accountant&#039;s audit report/certificate in Form XXXI is deemed satisfactory. The review petition by the Assam Drug Dealers Association was allowed, providing clarification on the compliance requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>