https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162350 The High Court ruled in favor of the dealer in a case involving the interpretation of sections of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The court held that the dealer did not contravene the Act by promptly remitting tax collected under a composition scheme, thus setting aside the notice of forfeiture under section 18-AA. Additionally, the court did not address the retrospective operation of section 8(14) of the Karnataka Taxation Laws Amendment Act, as it found the forfeiture issue to be decisive. The petitioner's challenge was allowed, and the court set aside the orders without awarding costs. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:00:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162350 The High Court ruled in favor of the dealer in a case involving the interpretation of sections of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The court held that the dealer did not contravene the Act by promptly remitting tax collected under a composition scheme, thus setting aside the notice of forfeiture under section 18-AA. Additionally, the court did not address the retrospective operation of section 8(14) of the Karnataka Taxation Laws Amendment Act, as it found the forfeiture issue to be decisive. The petitioner's challenge was allowed, and the court set aside the orders without awarding costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162350