<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 831 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162349</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant a concessional tax rate of 1% to an oil miller for inter-State sales of oil, based on the production of C forms and satisfaction of conditions in notification S.R.O. No. 117/66. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s revisions, stating that the assessee had met the requirements of the notification by showing that the coconut or copra from which oil was extracted had already been taxed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 831 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162349</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant a concessional tax rate of 1% to an oil miller for inter-State sales of oil, based on the production of C forms and satisfaction of conditions in notification S.R.O. No. 117/66. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s revisions, stating that the assessee had met the requirements of the notification by showing that the coconut or copra from which oil was extracted had already been taxed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>