<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 541 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162343</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Commissioner of Sales Tax&#039;s revision, setting aside the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s order and directing a fresh decision in light of the retrospective amendment regarding the taxation of old ornaments. The judgment emphasized the necessity of orders aligning with the law as amended retrospectively, ensuring consistency and compliance with updated legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:41:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 541 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162343</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Commissioner of Sales Tax&#039;s revision, setting aside the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s order and directing a fresh decision in light of the retrospective amendment regarding the taxation of old ornaments. The judgment emphasized the necessity of orders aligning with the law as amended retrospectively, ensuring consistency and compliance with updated legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>