<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Requires Substantial Evidence: False Affidavit Retraction and Appellant&#039;s Involvement in Fake Documents Must Be Proven.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17445</link>
    <description>Imposition of penalty - penalty on signatory - Unless cogent evidence is brought to record to say that retraction in affidavit is untruthful and the appellant was instrumental to create fake documents, role of the appellant cannot be appreciated. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:07:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Requires Substantial Evidence: False Affidavit Retraction and Appellant&#039;s Involvement in Fake Documents Must Be Proven.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17445</link>
      <description>Imposition of penalty - penalty on signatory - Unless cogent evidence is brought to record to say that retraction in affidavit is untruthful and the appellant was instrumental to create fake documents, role of the appellant cannot be appreciated. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:07:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>