<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1002 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands for Service Tax and penalties against the Applicant for services provided, directing a 25% deposit of the confirmed amount within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the Appeal without further notice. The decision emphasized financial compliance and the importance of adhering to directed deposits to avoid dismissal, balancing revenue interests with the Applicant&#039;s obligations under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1002 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands for Service Tax and penalties against the Applicant for services provided, directing a 25% deposit of the confirmed amount within eight weeks. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the Appeal without further notice. The decision emphasized financial compliance and the importance of adhering to directed deposits to avoid dismissal, balancing revenue interests with the Applicant&#039;s obligations under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>