https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244406 The appellate tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for recovery of irregular CENVAT credit and penalties against the appellant, criticizing the adjudicating authority for not properly considering the appellant's explanations and relevant case laws. The tribunal found the demand unsustainable, emphasizing the broad definition of input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The matter was remitted back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration, directing a thorough examination of the appellant's contentions and issuance of a reasoned order in compliance with the law. The appeal was allowed through remand, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244406 The appellate tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for recovery of irregular CENVAT credit and penalties against the appellant, criticizing the adjudicating authority for not properly considering the appellant's explanations and relevant case laws. The tribunal found the demand unsustainable, emphasizing the broad definition of input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The matter was remitted back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh consideration, directing a thorough examination of the appellant's contentions and issuance of a reasoned order in compliance with the law. The appeal was allowed through remand, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244406