<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 995 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244401</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for credit entries under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found the genuineness of transactions and the identity of remitters were inadequately proven, with evidence lacking to meet statutory requirements. Despite attempts to link remitting companies to individuals, the missing link in the transaction chain was not established, leading to the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 995 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244401</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for credit entries under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found the genuineness of transactions and the identity of remitters were inadequately proven, with evidence lacking to meet statutory requirements. Despite attempts to link remitting companies to individuals, the missing link in the transaction chain was not established, leading to the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>