<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 976 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244382</link>
    <description>Foreign-parent-employed personnel seconded to a liaison office remain employees of the parent where no employment contract or reimbursement liability exists between the liaison office and those personnel. Parent-company remittances for local salary disbursal therefore do not constitute the liaison office purchasing, acquiring, or borrowing foreign exchange under FERA. A contrary finding is inconsistent where no debt is treated as owing to the parent. Penalties for alleged foreign-exchange contraventions require judicial consideration of the relevant facts and a reasoned basis for quantification; an unexplained or arbitrary penalty is legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 976 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244382</link>
      <description>Foreign-parent-employed personnel seconded to a liaison office remain employees of the parent where no employment contract or reimbursement liability exists between the liaison office and those personnel. Parent-company remittances for local salary disbursal therefore do not constitute the liaison office purchasing, acquiring, or borrowing foreign exchange under FERA. A contrary finding is inconsistent where no debt is treated as owing to the parent. Penalties for alleged foreign-exchange contraventions require judicial consideration of the relevant facts and a reasoned basis for quantification; an unexplained or arbitrary penalty is legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>