<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 967 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand but ruled in favor of the appellant regarding interest payment, citing the absence of evidence for clandestine removal and immediate duty payment upon detection of shortages. Penalties on individuals, the General Manager and Director, were set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement in clandestine removal, leading to the disposal of all appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=347033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 967 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand but ruled in favor of the appellant regarding interest payment, citing the absence of evidence for clandestine removal and immediate duty payment upon detection of shortages. Penalties on individuals, the General Manager and Director, were set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement in clandestine removal, leading to the disposal of all appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>