<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 962 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244368</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment of turn over tax for a Bar Hotel under section 7 of the KGST Act. It held that the assessing authority was justified in using the method provided in section 7 for calculating the turn over tax, despite objections based on instructions from the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. The court clarified that the instructions did not override statutory provisions, and while it declined interference under Article 226, it allowed the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies against the assessment order. The court granted a temporary suspension of coercive recovery measures to facilitate this process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 962 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244368</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment of turn over tax for a Bar Hotel under section 7 of the KGST Act. It held that the assessing authority was justified in using the method provided in section 7 for calculating the turn over tax, despite objections based on instructions from the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. The court clarified that the instructions did not override statutory provisions, and while it declined interference under Article 226, it allowed the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies against the assessment order. The court granted a temporary suspension of coercive recovery measures to facilitate this process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>