<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 961 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244367</link>
    <description>Enhanced compensation arising from compulsory acquisition is taken into account only when the right to receive it actually accrues on grant of enhancement and the amount is received. Pending claims for enhancement do not justify inclusion in an earlier wealth-tax assessment year merely because the claim is under adjudication. Applying the settled receipt-based principle, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view that no addition could be made before actual receipt, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 961 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244367</link>
      <description>Enhanced compensation arising from compulsory acquisition is taken into account only when the right to receive it actually accrues on grant of enhancement and the amount is received. Pending claims for enhancement do not justify inclusion in an earlier wealth-tax assessment year merely because the claim is under adjudication. Applying the settled receipt-based principle, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view that no addition could be made before actual receipt, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>