<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 958 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244364</link>
    <description>The appellate authority ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the levy of service tax on delivery charges was not sustainable as service tax on freight charges had already been remitted. The respondent argued that the Committee of Commissioners failed to record an independent opinion as required by law, rendering the appeal invalid. The judgment emphasized the necessity for a valid decision by the Committee to support the legitimacy of an appeal, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of a proper opinion recorded by the Committee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 958 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244364</link>
      <description>The appellate authority ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the levy of service tax on delivery charges was not sustainable as service tax on freight charges had already been remitted. The respondent argued that the Committee of Commissioners failed to record an independent opinion as required by law, rendering the appeal invalid. The judgment emphasized the necessity for a valid decision by the Committee to support the legitimacy of an appeal, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to the lack of a proper opinion recorded by the Committee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>