<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 956 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244362</link>
    <description>Service tax under the reverse charge mechanism was not payable for overseas services where no remuneration or consideration had been paid. The liability to tax depended on payment for the service, and since the amount paid to the foreign provider was nil, the prerequisite for fastening service tax liability was absent. The factual finding on absence of consideration was decisive, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:42:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 956 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244362</link>
      <description>Service tax under the reverse charge mechanism was not payable for overseas services where no remuneration or consideration had been paid. The liability to tax depended on payment for the service, and since the amount paid to the foreign provider was nil, the prerequisite for fastening service tax liability was absent. The factual finding on absence of consideration was decisive, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>