<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 948 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244354</link>
    <description>Section 240 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was considered in the context of block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B, with the related question whether taxes paid under a block return were refundable under Section 158BH. The issue was confined to the notice-backed question, and the Court treated it as settled in light of Shelly Products. On that basis, the statutory refund provision was applied in the manner urged by the Revenue, and the contrary view taken by the High Court was rejected; the question was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 948 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244354</link>
      <description>Section 240 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was considered in the context of block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B, with the related question whether taxes paid under a block return were refundable under Section 158BH. The issue was confined to the notice-backed question, and the Court treated it as settled in light of Shelly Products. On that basis, the statutory refund provision was applied in the manner urged by the Revenue, and the contrary view taken by the High Court was rejected; the question was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>