<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 944 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the additional income declared during a search. The Tribunal held that the additional income was part of the business income from the eligible housing project, qualifying for the deduction. The decision applied to all assessment years under appeal, including 2010-11. The order was pronounced on 30th January 2014, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 944 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the additional income declared during a search. The Tribunal held that the additional income was part of the business income from the eligible housing project, qualifying for the deduction. The decision applied to all assessment years under appeal, including 2010-11. The order was pronounced on 30th January 2014, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>