<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 940 - ITAT PANJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244346</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the depreciation claim for the ship and directing the deletion of the additional lease rent amount added to the appellant&#039;s income. The detailed analysis of the ship&#039;s operational history and the accounting treatment of lease rent supported the decisions, resulting in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 06:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 940 - ITAT PANJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244346</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the depreciation claim for the ship and directing the deletion of the additional lease rent amount added to the appellant&#039;s income. The detailed analysis of the ship&#039;s operational history and the accounting treatment of lease rent supported the decisions, resulting in the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>