https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244332 The Tribunal allowed the application for the extension of the stay order originally granted in 2005 until the appeal is resolved. The decision was made in acknowledgment of the circumstances leading to the appeal's prolonged pendency and not due to any fault of the applicant. This judgment highlights the Tribunal's authority to extend stay orders even after the insertion of the third proviso to relevant sections of the Finance Act, 2013, emphasizing the discretion to grant extensions based on specific circumstances, especially when delays are beyond the appellant's control. en-us Mon, 30 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244332 The Tribunal allowed the application for the extension of the stay order originally granted in 2005 until the appeal is resolved. The decision was made in acknowledgment of the circumstances leading to the appeal's prolonged pendency and not due to any fault of the applicant. This judgment highlights the Tribunal's authority to extend stay orders even after the insertion of the third proviso to relevant sections of the Finance Act, 2013, emphasizing the discretion to grant extensions based on specific circumstances, especially when delays are beyond the appellant's control. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244332