<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 914 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244320</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed a Stay Petition due to the absence of any amount requiring stay and promptly disposed of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the first appellate authority had wrongly rejected a miscellaneous application for a certified copy of an Order-in-Appeal, holding that the authority lacked jurisdiction to do so. The Tribunal ordered the first appellate authority to provide the appellant with the requested certified copy. The judgment emphasized the importance of following proper procedures and avenues for obtaining documents and directed the disposal of both the Stay Petition and the appeal after granting the certified copy request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 914 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244320</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed a Stay Petition due to the absence of any amount requiring stay and promptly disposed of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the first appellate authority had wrongly rejected a miscellaneous application for a certified copy of an Order-in-Appeal, holding that the authority lacked jurisdiction to do so. The Tribunal ordered the first appellate authority to provide the appellant with the requested certified copy. The judgment emphasized the importance of following proper procedures and avenues for obtaining documents and directed the disposal of both the Stay Petition and the appeal after granting the certified copy request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>