<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 912 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244318</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal against the DVAT Tribunal&#039;s order for pre-deposit. Instead of the initial 20% requirement, the appellant was directed to pay 10% of the tax and interest due, with the penalty deposit waived. Compliance was extended by four weeks. The Court considered the previous order suspending pre-deposit entirely and adjusted the terms accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 912 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244318</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal against the DVAT Tribunal&#039;s order for pre-deposit. Instead of the initial 20% requirement, the appellant was directed to pay 10% of the tax and interest due, with the penalty deposit waived. Compliance was extended by four weeks. The Court considered the previous order suspending pre-deposit entirely and adjusted the terms accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>