<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 886 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244292</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 147 read with section 148 was invalid because the Assessing Officer proceeded on the same material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment and no fresh tangible material had emerged. The attempted reopening was treated as a mere change of opinion, which is insufficient to invoke reassessment powers where the earlier assessment had already considered the issue. The assessee therefore succeeded on the validity of the reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 886 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244292</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 147 read with section 148 was invalid because the Assessing Officer proceeded on the same material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment and no fresh tangible material had emerged. The attempted reopening was treated as a mere change of opinion, which is insufficient to invoke reassessment powers where the earlier assessment had already considered the issue. The assessee therefore succeeded on the validity of the reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>