<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 882 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision denying the refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under notification no.16/2008-Cus, remanding the case for a fresh decision. It found the ex parte order lacking a hearing for the appellant and emphasized the importance of considering tribunal precedents. The Tribunal highlighted that technical infractions should not automatically lead to denial of the refund claim, directing the adjudicating authority to ensure a fair evaluation of the conditions for the SAD exemption notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 882 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision denying the refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under notification no.16/2008-Cus, remanding the case for a fresh decision. It found the ex parte order lacking a hearing for the appellant and emphasized the importance of considering tribunal precedents. The Tribunal highlighted that technical infractions should not automatically lead to denial of the refund claim, directing the adjudicating authority to ensure a fair evaluation of the conditions for the SAD exemption notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>