https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162284 Provident fund, compulsory deposit, and pensionary dues retained their statutory immunity from attachment in execution until actually paid to the employee; sums held by the Government did not lose their protected character merely because they had become payable on retirement. The Union of India, as the authority holding and protecting those sums, had locus standi to object to wrongful attachment even where the judgment-debtor did not appear. The asserted separation of Rajya Sabha Secretariat staff did not defeat that objection. The attachment order and refusal to interfere were set aside, and the matter was remitted to determine the true character of the amount and its liability to execution. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162284 Provident fund, compulsory deposit, and pensionary dues retained their statutory immunity from attachment in execution until actually paid to the employee; sums held by the Government did not lose their protected character merely because they had become payable on retirement. The Union of India, as the authority holding and protecting those sums, had locus standi to object to wrongful attachment even where the judgment-debtor did not appear. The asserted separation of Rajya Sabha Secretariat staff did not defeat that objection. The attachment order and refusal to interfere were set aside, and the matter was remitted to determine the true character of the amount and its liability to execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162284