https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162279 A writ of mandamus to restrain check-post authorities from insisting on tax payment on agency purchases was refused because no specific actionable order or demand was shown. Although payments had been made under protest on interception of vehicles, the record did not establish a pleaded cause of action for a blanket writ. If the authorities acted under section 42 of the TNGST Act, 1959 without a reasoned order, the appropriate remedy was to challenge that action before the competent authorities when it arose. In the absence of an assailable order, the extraordinary writ jurisdiction was not invoked. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:43:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162279 A writ of mandamus to restrain check-post authorities from insisting on tax payment on agency purchases was refused because no specific actionable order or demand was shown. Although payments had been made under protest on interception of vehicles, the record did not establish a pleaded cause of action for a blanket writ. If the authorities acted under section 42 of the TNGST Act, 1959 without a reasoned order, the appropriate remedy was to challenge that action before the competent authorities when it arose. In the absence of an assailable order, the extraordinary writ jurisdiction was not invoked. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162279