<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 867 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244273</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the reduction of penalty to Rs. 30,000 per person in accordance with a CBDT clarification, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalty under section 272B was deemed person-centric, not tied to the number of defaults in the PAN. The tribunal emphasized that the penalty amount was linked to the individual, as clarified by the CBDT, supporting the decision to reduce the penalty per person per year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 867 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244273</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the reduction of penalty to Rs. 30,000 per person in accordance with a CBDT clarification, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalty under section 272B was deemed person-centric, not tied to the number of defaults in the PAN. The tribunal emphasized that the penalty amount was linked to the individual, as clarified by the CBDT, supporting the decision to reduce the penalty per person per year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>