<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162249</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the B6 notice, and directed the lifting of the bank account attachment of the petitioner. The court held that the petitioner and the other partnership firm are separate legal entities with no connection in terms of the sales tax arrears, deeming the notice unjustifiable. Consequently, the court ordered the removal of the bank account attachment and closed the related petitions without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:55:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162249</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the B6 notice, and directed the lifting of the bank account attachment of the petitioner. The court held that the petitioner and the other partnership firm are separate legal entities with no connection in terms of the sales tax arrears, deeming the notice unjustifiable. Consequently, the court ordered the removal of the bank account attachment and closed the related petitions without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>