<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 790 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162248</link>
    <description>The court allowed all four writ applications, ruling that tractors are included within the exemption provided by the notifications under sections 5(4) and 6(2) of the Bihar Finance Act. The clarification issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was quashed as it was found to be incorrect. The court emphasized the need for strict interpretation of taxing statutes and upheld the principle that any ambiguity should be resolved in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:48:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 790 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162248</link>
      <description>The court allowed all four writ applications, ruling that tractors are included within the exemption provided by the notifications under sections 5(4) and 6(2) of the Bihar Finance Act. The clarification issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was quashed as it was found to be incorrect. The court emphasized the need for strict interpretation of taxing statutes and upheld the principle that any ambiguity should be resolved in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>