<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 621 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162238</link>
    <description>Goods intercepted in transit were seized by the tax authority on allegations of misdescription, quantity mismatch and under-valuation, and a penalty order was imposed under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act. The assessee challenged the seizure as mechanical and contended that the goods were correctly described as PVC sheets, but the authority relied on discrepancies in the documents, market-price comparisons and its finding that the goods were fibre glass sheets. The Tribunal upheld the seizure as lawful and indicated that the penalty could be pursued through the statutory remedy; the High Court found no ground to interfere and left the dismissal undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 621 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162238</link>
      <description>Goods intercepted in transit were seized by the tax authority on allegations of misdescription, quantity mismatch and under-valuation, and a penalty order was imposed under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act. The assessee challenged the seizure as mechanical and contended that the goods were correctly described as PVC sheets, but the authority relied on discrepancies in the documents, market-price comparisons and its finding that the goods were fibre glass sheets. The Tribunal upheld the seizure as lawful and indicated that the penalty could be pursued through the statutory remedy; the High Court found no ground to interfere and left the dismissal undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>