<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 667 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162223</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order dated October 8, 2003, challenging the denial of exemption from sales tax. It directed the Commercial Taxes Officer to reevaluate the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to exemption benefits under relevant notifications, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and a reasoned decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 667 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162223</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order dated October 8, 2003, challenging the denial of exemption from sales tax. It directed the Commercial Taxes Officer to reevaluate the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to exemption benefits under relevant notifications, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and a reasoned decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>