<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 859 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO on account of disallowance of loss on sale of paintings and excess interest paid on unsecured loans. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, emphasizing the lack of evidence for tax evasion and reasonable interest rates for high-risk unsecured loans. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 859 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO on account of disallowance of loss on sale of paintings and excess interest paid on unsecured loans. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, emphasizing the lack of evidence for tax evasion and reasonable interest rates for high-risk unsecured loans. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>