<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 728 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162220</link>
    <description>Where the basic facts necessary for disposal are already on record, a tribunal should not remand the matter merely for fresh scrutiny and must decide the dispute on merits. The discretionary power to remand is to be exercised with restraint, particularly when no further factual investigation is needed. On that basis, the remand directions were held unjustified and were set aside, with the proceedings restored for merits-based determination by the tribunal itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 728 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162220</link>
      <description>Where the basic facts necessary for disposal are already on record, a tribunal should not remand the matter merely for fresh scrutiny and must decide the dispute on merits. The discretionary power to remand is to be exercised with restraint, particularly when no further factual investigation is needed. On that basis, the remand directions were held unjustified and were set aside, with the proceedings restored for merits-based determination by the tribunal itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>