<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 850 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244256</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to rectify the order under Section 154. The case was remanded to the Tribunal to determine the merits of the penalty levy under Section 271(1)(c), allowing the assessee to present arguments. The Tax Case was allowed solely on the jurisdictional issue, instructing the Tribunal to expedite the penalty hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:51:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 850 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244256</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to rectify the order under Section 154. The case was remanded to the Tribunal to determine the merits of the penalty levy under Section 271(1)(c), allowing the assessee to present arguments. The Tax Case was allowed solely on the jurisdictional issue, instructing the Tribunal to expedite the penalty hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>