<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 838 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244244</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by the assessee, remitting the classification issue back to the TPO for reconsideration based on evidence provided. The selection of comparable companies was also remitted pending the final classification determination. The ITAT dismissed the claim for pre-operating expenditure but directed the exclusion of communication charges from export turnover for deduction purposes under section 10A of the Act, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 838 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244244</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal by the assessee, remitting the classification issue back to the TPO for reconsideration based on evidence provided. The selection of comparable companies was also remitted pending the final classification determination. The ITAT dismissed the claim for pre-operating expenditure but directed the exclusion of communication charges from export turnover for deduction purposes under section 10A of the Act, ruling in favor of the assessee on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>