<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 817 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s application to recall the ex parte order for pre-deposit, allowing them to present their case. The dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods and inputs for a co-generation plant was based on the sale of electricity to an external entity. The appellant argued that denial of credit was unjustified under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant also contested the denial of credit on input services, citing lack of clear findings and quantification by the adjudicating Commissioner. The Tribunal remanded the case back for a comprehensive reevaluation, referencing a decision of the Allahabad High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 817 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s application to recall the ex parte order for pre-deposit, allowing them to present their case. The dispute over denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods and inputs for a co-generation plant was based on the sale of electricity to an external entity. The appellant argued that denial of credit was unjustified under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant also contested the denial of credit on input services, citing lack of clear findings and quantification by the adjudicating Commissioner. The Tribunal remanded the case back for a comprehensive reevaluation, referencing a decision of the Allahabad High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>