<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 426 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162211</link>
    <description>An exemption notification issued under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was treated as capable of extending to turnover tax under section 6-B because section 8-A was read as covering taxes leviable under the Act as a whole. The Court also held that copper sulphate continued to fall within the notification&#039;s expression &quot;insecticide/pesticide&quot; despite its later exclusion from the Second Schedule, because the notification had to be construed on its own terms and the later schedule amendment could not curtail its scope. On that basis, the revision orders were found unsustainable and the appellate orders restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:56:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 426 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162211</link>
      <description>An exemption notification issued under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was treated as capable of extending to turnover tax under section 6-B because section 8-A was read as covering taxes leviable under the Act as a whole. The Court also held that copper sulphate continued to fall within the notification&#039;s expression &quot;insecticide/pesticide&quot; despite its later exclusion from the Second Schedule, because the notification had to be construed on its own terms and the later schedule amendment could not curtail its scope. On that basis, the revision orders were found unsustainable and the appellate orders restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>