<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 659 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162205</link>
    <description>An eligibility certificate for tax exemption or deferment was refused because the petitioner had not produced a change of land use certificate from the town planning department. When that permission was obtained during the pendency of the writ petition, the original basis for refusal ceased to exist. The High Court therefore set aside the refusal order and directed the claim for an eligibility certificate to be reconsidered afresh on the changed factual position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 659 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162205</link>
      <description>An eligibility certificate for tax exemption or deferment was refused because the petitioner had not produced a change of land use certificate from the town planning department. When that permission was obtained during the pendency of the writ petition, the original basis for refusal ceased to exist. The High Court therefore set aside the refusal order and directed the claim for an eligibility certificate to be reconsidered afresh on the changed factual position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>