https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162202 A second stay application is not automatically barred merely because an earlier stay request was rejected, and the grant of stay will stand where the discretion is exercised with proper reasons and without illegality, irregularity, or impropriety. The document also states that a subordinate revenue authority lacks proper locus standi to challenge an order passed by the President of the Board under section 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987; such a challenge should be brought by the competent State authority. On these principles, interference with the impugned stay order was found unwarranted. en-us Mon, 19 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:17:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162202 A second stay application is not automatically barred merely because an earlier stay request was rejected, and the grant of stay will stand where the discretion is exercised with proper reasons and without illegality, irregularity, or impropriety. The document also states that a subordinate revenue authority lacks proper locus standi to challenge an order passed by the President of the Board under section 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987; such a challenge should be brought by the competent State authority. On these principles, interference with the impugned stay order was found unwarranted. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 19 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162202