<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 682 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162187</link>
    <description>Immovable property furnished as security at sales tax registration can be proceeded against for recovery of the dealer&#039;s arrears when the statutory scheme treats that security as available for realisation of tax payable. Reading the registration provisions and the revenue recovery law together, the Tribunal noted that security given under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was enforceable through the same recovery machinery applicable to revenue defaulters and sureties. The auction notice was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed because the secured tax dues could be enforced against the property offered as security.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 682 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162187</link>
      <description>Immovable property furnished as security at sales tax registration can be proceeded against for recovery of the dealer&#039;s arrears when the statutory scheme treats that security as available for realisation of tax payable. Reading the registration provisions and the revenue recovery law together, the Tribunal noted that security given under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was enforceable through the same recovery machinery applicable to revenue defaulters and sureties. The auction notice was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed because the secured tax dues could be enforced against the property offered as security.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>