<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 933 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162171</link>
    <description>Production of a change of land use certificate was a condition precedent for grant of an eligibility certificate under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975. The unit was established in 1996, before the municipal limits were extended, and the land was found to lie outside the original municipal limits but within the controlled area. On those facts, the statutory requirement for change of land use permission continued to apply, and the contention that the land later fell within municipal limits did not remove that obligation. The refusal to grant the eligibility certificate was therefore justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:05:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 933 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162171</link>
      <description>Production of a change of land use certificate was a condition precedent for grant of an eligibility certificate under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975. The unit was established in 1996, before the municipal limits were extended, and the land was found to lie outside the original municipal limits but within the controlled area. On those facts, the statutory requirement for change of land use permission continued to apply, and the contention that the land later fell within municipal limits did not remove that obligation. The refusal to grant the eligibility certificate was therefore justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>