<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Disallowing Depreciation for Director&#039;s Car Use u/s 38(2), Citing Lack of Personal Use Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17359</link>
    <description>Disallowing any part of the depreciation on account of personal use of the directors, u/s 38(2), does not appear to have been passed upon application of mind, when the director had no opportunity to use the car - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:40:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:40:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Disallowing Depreciation for Director&#039;s Car Use u/s 38(2), Citing Lack of Personal Use Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17359</link>
      <description>Disallowing any part of the depreciation on account of personal use of the directors, u/s 38(2), does not appear to have been passed upon application of mind, when the director had no opportunity to use the car - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:40:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>