<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 811 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting additions made under Sections 40A(3) and 68 of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that the cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 were justified under Rule 6DD due to exceptional circumstances in areas without banking facilities. Additionally, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking a cash payment of Rs. 1.30 crores directly to the assessee company, leading to the deletion of this addition under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 811 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting additions made under Sections 40A(3) and 68 of the Income Tax Act. It concluded that the cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 were justified under Rule 6DD due to exceptional circumstances in areas without banking facilities. Additionally, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking a cash payment of Rs. 1.30 crores directly to the assessee company, leading to the deletion of this addition under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>