<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 807 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled against the appellant, a Joint Venture company, in a case concerning waiver and stay of adjudged dues for service tax and education cesses. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims of not providing taxable service to the State Government, the Tribunal found them liable to pay service tax for &#039;works contract service.&#039; The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding financial hardships were deemed unsubstantiated, leading the Tribunal to direct a substantial pre-deposit within a specified timeframe to be eligible for waiver and stay of penalties and interest. Compliance was mandated under specified consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 807 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled against the appellant, a Joint Venture company, in a case concerning waiver and stay of adjudged dues for service tax and education cesses. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims of not providing taxable service to the State Government, the Tribunal found them liable to pay service tax for &#039;works contract service.&#039; The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding financial hardships were deemed unsubstantiated, leading the Tribunal to direct a substantial pre-deposit within a specified timeframe to be eligible for waiver and stay of penalties and interest. Compliance was mandated under specified consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>