<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 802 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244208</link>
    <description>Foreign group entities were found to have a Permanent Establishment in India because the Indian premises were available for use, personnel were deputed, control over deployed staff remained with the foreign entities, and the group business operated in an integrated manner. As a result, the receipts from the Indian company were treated as business profits rather than standalone fees for technical services; where a treaty applied, taxation followed the business profits article, and where no treaty applied, the income was chargeable under the Act. Since the income was taxable in India, the Indian company was required to deduct tax at source under section 195.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 802 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244208</link>
      <description>Foreign group entities were found to have a Permanent Establishment in India because the Indian premises were available for use, personnel were deputed, control over deployed staff remained with the foreign entities, and the group business operated in an integrated manner. As a result, the receipts from the Indian company were treated as business profits rather than standalone fees for technical services; where a treaty applied, taxation followed the business profits article, and where no treaty applied, the income was chargeable under the Act. Since the income was taxable in India, the Indian company was required to deduct tax at source under section 195.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>