<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 788 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244194</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the addition of Long Term Capital Gain on the sale of immovable property due to insufficient evidence and non-compliance with exemption criteria. The ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning the lump sum addition for Low Household withdrawals, reducing the amount added to the income. The judgment was pronounced on 14-02-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:25:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 788 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244194</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the addition of Long Term Capital Gain on the sale of immovable property due to insufficient evidence and non-compliance with exemption criteria. The ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning the lump sum addition for Low Household withdrawals, reducing the amount added to the income. The judgment was pronounced on 14-02-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>