<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 780 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244186</link>
    <description>Nylon 6 resin imported in granule form was examined for eligibility as &quot;nylon chips&quot; under the customs exemption for material used in manufacture of nylon filament yarn, subject to the prescribed concessional procedure. Because the tariff material did not define &quot;chips&quot;, the term was read in commercial and industry parlance. The evidence indicated that resin, chips and granules were used interchangeably in the relevant trade, and no convincing technical material established a clear distinction between nylon chips and nylon granules. On that basis, the imported goods were treated as nylon chips for exemption purposes, and the duty demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 780 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244186</link>
      <description>Nylon 6 resin imported in granule form was examined for eligibility as &quot;nylon chips&quot; under the customs exemption for material used in manufacture of nylon filament yarn, subject to the prescribed concessional procedure. Because the tariff material did not define &quot;chips&quot;, the term was read in commercial and industry parlance. The evidence indicated that resin, chips and granules were used interchangeably in the relevant trade, and no convincing technical material established a clear distinction between nylon chips and nylon granules. On that basis, the imported goods were treated as nylon chips for exemption purposes, and the duty demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>