<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 768 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244174</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that the value of bought-out Line Circuit Cards (LCCs) should not be included in the assessable value of EPABX systems for central excise duty purposes. The Tribunal found that LCCs were optional and not integral to the functionality of the systems, as most EPABX systems were sold without LCCs. Relying on legal precedents, including cases like Webel Telecommunications and Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co., the Tribunal allowed the main appellant&#039;s appeal and set aside the Order in Appeal. Consequently, appeals by other appellants were also allowed, establishing clarity on the assessment of optional components in the assessable value of manufactured goods for central excise duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 768 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244174</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that the value of bought-out Line Circuit Cards (LCCs) should not be included in the assessable value of EPABX systems for central excise duty purposes. The Tribunal found that LCCs were optional and not integral to the functionality of the systems, as most EPABX systems were sold without LCCs. Relying on legal precedents, including cases like Webel Telecommunications and Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co., the Tribunal allowed the main appellant&#039;s appeal and set aside the Order in Appeal. Consequently, appeals by other appellants were also allowed, establishing clarity on the assessment of optional components in the assessable value of manufactured goods for central excise duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>