<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 766 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Essar Oil Ltd, holding that the denial of CENVAT Credit of Rs. 3,15,85,715/- was incorrect. The payment of the differential duty was considered a result of reassessment, making the credit admissible under Rule 9(1)(c) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the penalties and redemption fine imposed were set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 766 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Essar Oil Ltd, holding that the denial of CENVAT Credit of Rs. 3,15,85,715/- was incorrect. The payment of the differential duty was considered a result of reassessment, making the credit admissible under Rule 9(1)(c) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the penalties and redemption fine imposed were set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=244172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>