<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 590 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162147</link>
    <description>Kerala HC held that check-post authorities may detain goods in transit under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act where, on a prima facie basis, undervaluation suggests an attempt to evade tax, so the detention notices under section 29-A(2) were valid. The Court further held that section 28-A, which addresses a different mechanism involving sales or purchases shown below prevailing market price, does not displace or exclude the detention power under section 29-A. The two provisions operate in separate fields, and section 28-A was not the exclusive remedy to challenge action taken for suspected undervaluation and tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:40:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=346514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 590 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162147</link>
      <description>Kerala HC held that check-post authorities may detain goods in transit under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act where, on a prima facie basis, undervaluation suggests an attempt to evade tax, so the detention notices under section 29-A(2) were valid. The Court further held that section 28-A, which addresses a different mechanism involving sales or purchases shown below prevailing market price, does not displace or exclude the detention power under section 29-A. The two provisions operate in separate fields, and section 28-A was not the exclusive remedy to challenge action taken for suspected undervaluation and tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>